The Gulf Oil Disaster That Never Was

Quoting The Daily Mail
(I inserted the link):

“In recent days, though, we have witnessed an extraordinary U-turn in America’s attitude towards the great spill.

It began when a respected Time magazine environmental writer voiced the near-heretical proposition: that the effects of the Deepwater Horizon disaster on April 20 had been massively hyped.

His article was largely based on the opinions of Professor Ivan van Heerden, a brilliant but controversial marine scientist fired by Louisiana State University after publishing a book about Hurricane Katrina that said cataclysmic flooding was inevitable because the protection given to the coast [by massively corrupt and incompetent government bureaucrats] was wholly inadequate.

He said: ‘There is just no data to suggest this is an environmental disaster - although BP lied about the size of the oil spill, we’re not seeing catastrophic impacts.’ ”

Click the image & read the rest:

The greater damage -- by FAR -- is coming from the pinheads in Washington D.C.
What else is new?

Click here for a related post.