Andrew Klavan on Abortion

Quoting the dissenting opinion of Justice White
in the 1973 case of Roe v. Wade:

“I find nothing in the language or history of the Constitution to support the Court's judgment. The Court simply fashions and announces a new constitutional right for pregnant mothers [410 U.S. 222] and, with scarcely any reason or authority for its action, invests that right with sufficient substance to override most existing state abortion statutes. The upshot is that the people and the legislatures of the 50 States are constitutionally dissentitled to weigh the relative importance of the continued existence and development of the fetus, on the one hand, against a spectrum of possible impacts on the mother, on the other hand.”

Roe v. Wade has NOTHING to do with abortion “rights” and EVERYTHING to do with STATES rights. If Roe v. Wade were overturned, that would MERELY return to the states the Constitutionally guaranteed RIGHT for their duly ELECTED legislators to decide this issue state by state. Click here and read the tenth amendment.
And, now, Andrew Klavan on abortion:

Click here to learn more.