One would think that the backlash from SplatterGate might have given the propagandists some pause to question such an extremist approach. Apparently not!
On 12/27/2010, Andrew Revkin -- writing in the New York Times -- says:
“There are quite a few video clips out there aiming to distinguish weather from climate, but the best — to my mind — is the one that follows:”
Jail time for politically incorrect views on climate change? Really? Alarmists find that appropriate, even as a joke?
So, in the minds of the alarmists…
The 2010 El Nino driven warmth was “climate”, but the 2010 La Nina driven big freeze was just “weather”? Really? Seriously?
I wonder…
Is a 23 year USA winter trend “climate” or “weather”. Is a 15 year global trend “climate” or “weather”? The answer (clearly) depends upon whether the trend fits the CAGW propaganda.
Perhaps the creator of the film could explain the “climate” vs. “weather” concept to Simon Schuster and Time Magazine (and many, many others in the alarmist camp).
Is one man’s “climate” another man’s “weather”?
Alarmists desperately want us to ONLY focus on the last 150 years (of wildly unreliable data).
But, the bigger (and FAR more accurate) picture shows that both the Arctic AND the Antarctic are experiencing an on-going, uninterrupted 10,000 year cooling trend which shows NO SIGNS of abating. The citation links and more details are found here and here.
Call it weather or call it climate. By either name, Gaia played a particularly amusing joke on the CAGW propagandist boondoogle in Cancun this year! Now THAT is FUNNY!
Totalitarian tyranny is NOT funny. Right now, those opposed to the regulation of CO2 are winning in the court of public opinion AND in the scientific community, but the purely political tyrants have imposed their tyranny anyway.
Click here to debunk the hysteria topic by topic.
No comments:
Post a Comment