Quoting WorldNetDaily:
“A 16-hour-old newborn was snatched from her parents by authorities in Concord, N.H., after social services workers alleged the father is a member of Oath Keepers.
The organization collects affirmations from soldiers and peace officers that they would refuse orders that violate the U.S. Constitution, in light of what they perceive as the advance of socialism in the U.S.
The father, Johnathon Irish, told WND that the affidavit signed by Child Protective Service worker Dana Bicford seeking government custody of newborn Cheyenne said the agency ‘became aware and confirmed that Mr. Irish associated with a militia known as the Oath Keepers.’ ”
If these allegations sound far fetched,
then click here and here and think again.
Maybe some people take their oaths more seriously than others.
Maybe Constitution hating “Progressives” find that threatening.
There may or may not have been a legitimate concern about the safety of this child. What is shocking about this is the multiply sourced allegation that the government cited membership in “Oath Keepers” in their affidavit as even PART of their reason for taking this child.
Maybe the Feds know something about “Oath Keepers” that I don’t know. But, if the Oath Keeper mission is strictly what they say it is -- a pledge to passively resist patently unconstitutional orders -- then the government has NO BUSINESS persecuting members of this organization! PERIOD!
No comments:
Post a Comment