Delaware Voters Manipulated by Media

I strongly supported Christine O’Donnell and I would support her again.

Unfortunately, The Bearded Marxist has defeated Christine.

How did this happen? Delaware voters allowed themselves to be cynically manipulated by a media which has NO integrity.

The media smeared Christine O’Donnell in exactly the same manner that Sarah Palin -- in 2008 -- was smeared by the media.

I guarantee you that the average voter who chose The Bearded Marxist over Christine O’Donnell could not have told you ONE THING about Christine’s policy positions. But, every damn one of them could cite chapter and verse from the various utterly irrelevant tapes cynically released by Bill (the scumbag) Maher.

To better understand how the media stole the 2008 election; watch this video clip to the end. If the producers of that documentary did a similar survey of those who voted for The Bearded Marxist, I guarantee we would see directly analogous results!

SHAME ON YOU BILL MAHER!

SHAME ON YOU, you media scumbags!

You STOLE another election!

The Latest Ignorance Based Assault on Christine O'Donnell

Disclaimer -- I am a lifelong agnostic who believes in the THEORY of evolution. Unlike Chris Coons, I am NOT a totalitarian Marxist who would dictate which theories may and may not be taught (or even discussed) in government run schools.

In her latest debate, Christine O’Donnell had the temerity to ask her Marxist opponent:

“Where in the Constitution is the separation of church and state?”

On queue, the breathtakingly ignorant and fully indoctrinated audience laughed at what they clearly regarded as the latest gotcha moment reaffirming the utterly dishonest media created meme of just how ignorant this Tea Party rube is. The media, of course, are piling on in support of their own utterly dishonest meme.

What was missing -- both at the debate and in the media propaganda -- was ANY legitimate answer to her very legitimate question. Why? Because there is no legitimate answer to her question. Religion is mentioned once and ONLY once in the entire Constitution -- in the First Amendment. But, the First Amendment provides ONLY for freedom OF religion, not freedom FROM religion:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”

If anybody was demonstrated to be ignorant of the Constitution, it was Coons. Not only does he fail to understand the extremely clear and extremely limited meaning of the First Amendment, he even misquoted the amendment -- substituting the word “government” for the word “Congress”.

Now, click here to start this clip at the beginning and listen to Christine’s defense of intellectual freedom where the question of the origin of life is concerned.

As for the various constitutional amendments Christine was asked to comment on…
First, did you notice the so-called “moderator” gave Coons the advantage of requiring Christine to recall off the top of her head what each of these three amendments provided for? Second, click here for some insight into what is arguably the most destructive of all Constitutional amendments perpetrated by so-called “Progressives” (back when they actually bothered to pay any attention at all to the supreme law of the land).

Did I mention that -- for very good reason -- I really despise almost all so-called “journalists”?

Click here for more on Christine O’Donnell.

Christine O'Donnell Drives the Liberals Nuts

Law professor Ann Althouse comments on
the latest assault on Christine O’Donnell:

“Does this really work as an attack? I mean, as an attack on O'Donnell? Is it not instead or also an attack on the gaggle of liberals who gang up on and mock her? Maher brings on one woman — undoubtedly partly because she's pretty — and makes a punching bag out of her. They are so cocksure of themselves — both of their politics and of their funniness. It's really rather creepy and embarrassing for them.”

Click the image, watch the clip, read the rest:

Click here & examine the results of the assault on Palin.
Will Delaware suffer a similar fate?
The media are doing to O’Donnell EXACTLY what they did to Palin. Why? Because the media have spent decades indoctrinating Americans to believe that American women are all pro-abortion lovers of big government. In particular, the Cultural Marxists in the media want American women to believe that -- if they do not blindly support the utterly unconstitutional tyranny of Roe v. Wade and the national horror of abortion on demand -- then they are traitors to their gender. Pro-life Conservative women like Palin and O’Donnell are an existential threat to the very core of the Leftist propaganda machine. In the “minds” of the media, such women MUST be destroyed at ANY cost!
Click here for more on O’Donnell.
Click here & learn why I strongly support O’Donnell.

The Delaware Debate as Media Bias

Last night, Christine O’Donnell debated the bearded Marxist (Chris Coons). The debate was held at the University of Delaware and was broadcast live by CNN.

My first observation was that an inordinate amount of time was spent pandering to pre-selected, video taped questions from young, naïve, fully indoctrinated “students” at the Marxist indoctrination camp euphemistically known to some as The University of Delaware. I’m sure the bearded Marxist appreciated that gesture.

But, what else would we have expected from debate moderators Wolf Blitzer of CNN and Nancy Karibjanian of Delaware First Media.

Secondly, the emerging consensus is that the most effective “gotcha” question of the night came when Nancy Karibjanian asked O’Donnell:

“What opinions, of late, that have come from our high court, do you most object to?”

My immediate reaction to that question was -- what’s not to like among recent rulings from a Conservative leaning court which has upheld and affirmed both the First Amendment and the Second Amendment? Can you see the making of a “gotcha” question from a propagandist posing as a debate moderator? Why not ask her which opinions she liked?

As it turns out, I too am a victim of a biased media which focused all it’s negativity in criticizing the upholding of the Constitution while brazenly ignoring open assaults on the same.

Click here for the 20-20 hindsight insight into how O’Donnell might have answered a question which -- owing to media bias -- nobody but a Supreme Court scholar could have possibly been prepared to answer.

The media are deliberately doing to Christine O’Donnell EXACTLY what they did to Sarah Palin. Click here to examine the 2008 impact of that extremely biased media assault. Did I mention that I really despise most so-called “journalists”?

Christine O'Donnell for the United States Senate

By now, most in the know have heard the criticisms of Christine O’Donnell -- the Tea Party candidate who beat the odds to win the Republican nomination in the Delaware Senate race.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume her harshest critics have it right. For starters, let’s assume (rightly or wrongly) that she is not a mental genius. Well, only those who expect government to solve all their problems need geniuses to represent them. Actually, considering it is utterly impossible for government to solve all (or any) of their problems, what so-called “Progressives” are really looking for in their candidates is some fictional level of intelligence from some imaginary universe.

Come on! We have a Harvard graduate in the White House! So, how’s that hopey changey thing working for you so far?

We do NOT need intellectual giants OR over achievers representing us in the Senate! The ONLY quality we need to be looking for is somebody who will vote to limit the role of government. PERIOD! ANYBODY who comes to the Senate with that as a priority can EASILY achieve that goal! Christine O’Donnell will do just that.

Oh…
Did I mention that Christine is running against an apparent Marxist? Don’t we already have too many Marxists in Washington D.C.? Haven’t they done enough harm already?

And, that is why I would be overjoyed to see Christine O’Donnell in the United States Senate! Go get ‘em Christine!