Showing posts with label Climate Change - Copenhagen Summit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Climate Change - Copenhagen Summit. Show all posts

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Barack Obama’s climate deal unravels

Quoting The TimesOnline:
“The United Nations climate change conference ended in recrimination yesterday without reaching a clear deal on emissions targets.

After a stormy session in Copenhagen, in which a vociferous anti-American minority brought the talks close to collapse, most countries agreed simply to ‘take note’ of a watered-down agreement brokered by President Barack Obama and supported by Britain.

This accord — which had been drawn up in discussions with China and 30 or so other countries on Friday — sets a target of limiting global warming to a maximum of 2C above pre-industrial times.”
Click the image & read the rest:
Click the image & read the rest

Hurrah for no legally binding stupidity!

For a quick glimpse into the breathtaking ignorance of this “accord”, who can tell me what the official temperature was during “pre-industrial times”?

During the last 10,000 years, the temperature at Vostok, Antarctica has varied from more than 2C above the annual mean temperature for 2008 to almost 2C below the annual mean temperature for 2008 (making 2008 -- in one sense -- almost PERFECTLY “NORMAL”).

Thus, just over the last 10,000 years, we have a range of NATURAL variability of about 4C. So, along this 4C range of variability, which is the magic temperature which the moronic bureaucrats will select as the official temperature for “pre-industrial times”?

Roughly 128,000 years ago, the temperature at the same location was more than 3C above the annual mean temperature for 2008. Ergo, the “accord” declares that NATURAL VARIATIONS in temperature are excessive and we must find a way to prevent MOTHER NATURE from doing what Mother Nature will do anyway.

You see, if we want to guarantee that the current interglacial warming period will not reach the maximum temperatures achieved during the previous perfectly natural interglacial warming period, we will have to find a way to “correct” each of the three different orbital eccentricities of our planet which are collectively known as Milankovitch Cycles.

For now, we can just be grateful that these moronic, ignorant, greedy and unspeakably evil power mongers failed to agree to anything which would be legally binding. But, rest assured -- the evil doers are not done yet. They will soon be back attempting the very same power grab.

Click here for the substantiating science.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Blair: Hang the science, we want your money!

Quoting The U.K. Telegraph:
“The world must take action on climate change at Copenhagen even if the science is not correct, Tony Blair, the former Prime Minister has suggested.

Following the ‘climategate scandal’, Mr Blair said the science may not be ‘as certain as its proponents allege’.

But he said the world should act as a precaution against floods, droughts and mass extinction caused by climate change, in fact it would be ‘grossly irresponsible’ not to.”
Click the image & read the rest:
Click the image & read the rest

What Blair is really saying is that political tyrants all around the world are salivating at the best chance they have ever had to separate the people of the world from $45 TRILLION of their hard earned money.

In the USA alone, the Obama administration -- only after coming face to face with one of those nasty old FOIA requests -- revealed that their own analysis concluded that Waxman-Markey would cost the average American family $2,641 per year.

“[F]loods, droughts and mass extinction” will all happen no matter WHAT the stinking politicians do -- because, as George Carlin knew, they are all NATURAL events!

Click here for more on ClimateGate.
Click here for some basic climate change science.

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Copenhagen: A climate of manipulation

Quoting The (Australian) Daily Telegraph:
“Some naive folk, who probably still don't understand that governments do not, in fact, make money of their own but merely take what has been earned by others and redistribute it to causes they think will win them the most votes, may believe that the wealth redistribution will actually lower the temperature of the planet.

There is no evidence, scientific or otherwise, that this will happen. The only certainty is that billions will be ripped off by bankers and other middle men before the remainder arrives in the Third World to be looted by a line-up of dictators and tyrants.”
Click the image & read the rest:
Click the image & read the rest
Click here for more on ClimateGate.
Click here for some basic climate change science.

Thursday, December 10, 2009

EPA Carbon Bomb Fizzles

Quoting Kim Strassel at The Wall Street Journal
(I inserted the links):
“In the high-stakes game of chicken the Obama White House has been playing with Congress over who will regulate the earth's climate, the president's team just motored into a ditch.

The threat the White House has been leveling at Congress is the Environmental Protection Agency's ‘endangerment finding,’ which EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson finally issued this week. The finding lays the groundwork for the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions across the entire economy, on the grounds that global warming is hazardous to human health…

President Obama, having failed to get climate legislation, didn't want to show up to the Copenhagen climate talks with a big, fat nothing. So the EPA pulled the pin. In doing so, it exploded its own threat…

Now that the endangerment finding has become reality, the litigation is also about to become real. Green groups pioneered the art of environmental lawsuits. It turns out the business community took careful notes.

Industry groups are gearing up for a legal onslaught; and don't underestimate their prospects. The leaked emails from the Climatic Research Unit in England alone are a gold mine for those who want to challenge the science underlying the theory of manmade global warming.”
Click the face of tyranny & read the rest:
Click the face of tyranny & read the rest
Click here for some basic climate change science.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

One More Nail in Copenhagen's Coffin

Quoting Reuters:
“Australia's parliament rejected laws to set up a sweeping carbon trade scheme on Wednesday, scuttling a key climate change policy of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd…

Rudd had hoped to take his carbon emissions trade scheme to next week's global talks in Copenhagen, where world leaders will discuss new targets to curb greenhouse gas emissions.”
Click the image & read the rest:
Click the image & read the rest

Reuters -- ever true to the dictates of their overlords -- can always be counted on to preach the gospel according to AGW hysteria. And, this article is no exception.

But, the bottom line here is that Obama will have no Cap and Trade legislation to take to Copenhagen and, now, Rudd will have nothing to take to Copenhagen. India and China will (wisely) not sacrifice their progress in lifting their people out of poverty just to satisfy the high priests of the Western AGW religion.

So, mercifully, it is looking more and more like the best (or, more accurately, worst) the Copenhagen tyrants will come home with is a meaningless and toothless symbolic gesture. But, even if they fail to secure their power grab, these scumbags are perfectly happy to hypocritically indulge themselves in wining, dining and luxury travel at the taxpayer expense. So, after (hopefully) “accomplishing” nothing, they will soon begin booking their next boondoggle wherein they will take another stab (pun intended) at sodomizing the rest of the world.

Click here for the previous post on Comrade Rudd.
Click here for some basic climate change science.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

ClimateGate, Copenhagen Style?

Quoting WorldNetDaily:
“Attorneys for WND today threatened the United Nations with a lawsuit for its refusal, thus far, to issue press credentials for coverage of the global climate-change convention next month in Copenhagen.

WND's senior staff writer Jerome Corsi has been seeking the credentials from the U.N. Framework Convention for Climate Change for weeks – providing all of the documentation requested and establishing his bona fides as a full-time reporter for the largest independent English-language Internet news organization in the world.

Until today, despite repeated requests, the UNFCCC had refused to acknowledge whether Corsi, a two-time No. 1 New York Times bestselling author, will be permitted to attend the meetings that have been hailed by organizers as a major step forward in ‘global governance.’ ”
Click the image & read the rest:
Click the image & read the rest
The “scientists” at the CRU conspired to exclude skeptical scientists.
Are the Copenhagen tyrants doing the same with the press?

Click here for more on ClimateGate.
Click here for basic climate change science.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

There will be no climate treaty in December

Quoting The New York Times:
“President Obama and other world leaders have decided to put off the difficult task of reaching a climate change agreement at a global climate conference scheduled for next month, agreeing instead to make it the mission of the Copenhagen conference to reach a less specific ‘politically binding’ agreement that would punt the most difficult issues into the future.”
Click the image & read the rest:
Click the image & read the rest

Okay, we have -- for NOW -- dodged the climate treaty bullet. But, how much harm will come from this “politically binding” agreement? And, how long before these global tyrants take another stab at this brazen power grab?

I wonder if this British poll and this American poll factored into the retreat. As of today (11/15/09) the Brits reject AGW hysteria by a margin of 7,330 to 4,643 (61% to 39%) and only 37% of Americans believe global warming is primarily caused by human activity. Is it possible that even the Dims are hesitant to be THAT brazen in imposing their tyranny upon an unwilling majority?

Click here for more on the disastrous climate bill.
Click here for some basic climate change science.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Obama Likely to Skip Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen

Quoting Fox News (enemy of the state):
“President Obama is ‘leaning toward not going’ to the U.N. climate change conference in Copenhagen, Denmark…

On big reason… is… because of the slow progress of climate change legislation in the U.S. Senate. Absent Senate passage of a climate change bill mandating a cap-and-trade system, Obama will have nothing to bring to Copenhagen as part of a U.S.-led effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, a factor likely to undermine global efforts to curb those emissions.”
Click the image & read the rest:
Click the image & read the rest
If NOTHING is done in Copenhagen, it will be a VERY good thing!

Click here for the cost of Cap & Trade.
Click here for basic climate change science.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Copenhagen - The Most Massively Corrupt Endeavor EVER!

Quoting The Financial Post:
“At Copenhagen, the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will attempt to get about 140 nations to approve a new global plan to reduce carbon emissions and, at the same time, engineer a major redistribution of money from developed nations to developing nations. An early draft of the Copenhagen agreement, to replace the collapsing Kyoto Protocol, suggests the focus is as much on redistribution as on carbon reduction, with no guarantee that any of it will have the slightest impact on carbon emissions or the global climate.

In climate policy circles, trillion-dollar transfers and programs proliferate and, in total, easily overtake the paper losses suffered by financial markets through the 2008 crisis. The International Monetary Fund recently set its estimate of the global losses from the financial crisis for 2007-2010 to be US$3.4-billion. The draft Copenhagen document proposes annual “financial flows” to developing nations of somewhere between $70- and $140-billion. At $140-billion, the ten-year tab would run to $1.4-trillion. But forcing carbon-based energy out of the global economy will take a lot more than that…

The big difference between the financial meltdown losses and carbon control spending is that the financial market losses are paper losses that, in time, will turn around. The IMF said the financial markets have already recouped 15% of their losses as securities values rebound. The carbon spending, if it were to take place, would be lost money never to be recouped. An expenditure of $3.4-trillion to pump carbon into the ground is $3.4-trillion vapourized into black holes.”
Click the image & read the rest:
Click the image & read the rest
Click here for more on the carbon sequestration folly.

Kyoto was an abysmal failure.
And, Copenhagen will be FAR MORE DESTRUCTIVE!
This is -- by FAR -- the most massively corrupt endeavor EVER!
Click here for a climate change science overview.

Hot Topics:

BEST Data - No Warming Over Last Decade
The AMO as a Driver of Climate Change
Fact check - The wealthy already pay more taxes
Rare Earth Elements Spell Doom for Green Fantasies
Wikipedia’s Climate Doctor
ClimateGate - The latest updates
Dr. Tim Ball on ClimateGate - The end of AGW hysteria?
ClimateGate: The Musical - Hide The Decline!
Lindzen and Choi SHATTER the IPCC Computer models!
It’s OFFICIAL! We HAVE elected our own Hugo Chavez!
Health Care “Reform”
Cap & Trade - It’s just a giant tax (on EVERYBODY)
The Radicals in the White House
ACORN - The truth
Transparency - Obama promised it. So, where is it?
The Cause of the Housing Debacle
Fiscal Responsibility - In Obama’s Fantasy World
Atlas Shrugged: From Fiction to Fact in 52 Years
Iraq War Media Deceptions 101 - Why the Iraq invasion was justified and necessary
Climate Change 101 - Learn what the SCIENCE says about the biggest hoax EVER!
Obama - on Climate Change
Obama’s Climate Czar - The most dangerous politician in the United States
Obama’s Climate Czar - Her Socialist revolution has begun
Compare the current recession to previous recessions
Obama - Historic & Catastrophic!
Is Obama a Socialist? You BETCHA!
Makers & Takers - Spread the wealth
Obama = International Crisis
The economic case against Obama
The comprehensive case against Obama
The deficit case against the Dems
A Liberal Supermajority? Watch Out!
Examine the series you should have read before voting!
Maggie’s Totalitarian Political Religion
“Kill him!” - Just another media lie?
Journalistic Integrity? - WHERE?
The post about the TED Spread
Save the nation from the Entitlement binge!
Market Reaction to $700 Billion Bailout Vote
Drill Here, Drill Now - Quantitative Facts
ANWR - Drill There, Drill Now
ANWR Matters - Here’s why
Coal Liquefaction (Liquid Fuels From Coal)
The Ethanol Debacle
Pickens Plan - Don’t Fall For it!
Energy Tomorrow Radio - GOOD Stuff!
Economic Forecast
Iraq
Obama
More…

Labels

Blog Archive