“On screen, he has already saved the world several times over in ever more convoluted ways. Now Kiefer Sutherland, the actor who plays secret agent Jack Bauer in the hit US show 24, has pledged to fight global warming as the series aims to become the first carbon neutral TV programme.”
“In the announcement, Sutherland says: ‘Global warming is a crime for which we are all guilty. From our cars to our homes and our workplaces, we are all releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, thus raising the temperature of our planet.’
As the 24 clock ticks down, he adds: ‘If we don't do something about it now, this change in our climate will unleash irreversible damage. All of us at 24 understand the urgency of this problem and over the next year we will be implementing creative new ways to more efficiently produce our show and significantly reduce our carbon footprint. And you can too.’ ”
Or is he merely reading the words
of uber idiot James Murdoch?
Click the image & read the rest:
Here’s the idiotic PSA:
Click here for the facts on Climate Change.
Click here for More CO2 Hollywood Idiot Nominees.
2 comments:
I don't as where the PSA is "idiotic".
Mr. Sutherland and the producers at Fox wished to share this message and they did so with respect. If you do not agree with it you are equal in your right to do so, but by showing disrespect you make the issue personal.
You don't have to be a climate scientist to look at objective data and make logical conclusions.
On the other hand, there are far too many "celebrities" who haven't the vaguest notion of the machinery behind this cause or that and yet lend their name and likeness to promote it. That's not so good.
So..lets' keep it respectful shall we?
“lets' keep it respectful shall we?”
Let’s not…
My respect must be earned -- I don’t hand it out for free. Do you? Courtesy I will give freely (until some idiot proves they are also unworthy of that).
“you make the issue personal”
No…
Those who lend their personhood to the promotion of purely political tyranny make the issue personal.
“You don't have to be a climate scientist to look at objective data and make logical conclusions.”
Which “objective data” are you referring to?
1) The temperature data which have been demonstrated by peer reviewed science to contain “an estimated warm bias of about 30%”?
2) The utterly discredited purely political propaganda published by the IPCC and promoted by brazen propagandists posing as “journalists”?
3) Or, the peer reviewed science which refutes their tyrannical nonsense?
Post a Comment