Click here for the “official report” from the alarmists at NOAA.
Click here to reproduce the graphs presented below.
Inconvenient Truths about Continental USA Temperatures:
2009 - 3rd coldest October since 1895!
2009 - October was 4F COLDER than the 1901-2000 average!
YTD 2009 - ONLY 0.17F warmer than the 1901-2000 average!
YTD 1998 to 2009 - A cooling trend of -1.05F per decade!
Continental USA, October temperatures, 1895-2009
Click the graph to enlarge it:
Highlighting and numerical annotation (1,2,3) are mine.
Continental USA, YTD (Jan-Oct) temperatures, 1998-2009
Click the graph to enlarge it:
Click here to further examine the current cooling trend.
Click here for basic climate change science.
7 comments:
Thanks a lot for this update! Permission to use the above charts, I will use them in my online debate re climate at my facebook Notes.
Nonoy Oplas,
You have my permission (as does anybody else) to use anything I have ever created anywhere you please.
I claim no copyright to any of it.
Best Regards,
SBVOR
And Septemeber was the second warmest GLOBALLY since 1880 according to NOAA.
The inconvenient truth about cherry-picking REGIONAL temperatures and pretending they are global - you can be easily made to look very stupid.
Tom Dubya,
1) Nobody represented regional data as global data.
2) September? Show me the data.
3) Click here and note the warming bias inherent in the surface stations used by NOAA.
4) Click here for FAR more reliable satellite data (and note that the raw data -- which I have personally verified -- are linked to on that page).
5) The alarmists at GISS assert that AGW is most evident in winter warming in the northern hemisphere. And yet, NOAA reports a 17 year winter cooling trend in the lower 48 (northern hemisphere).
6) Click here for more on the current cooling trend.
7) Click here for a brief overview of directly cited peer reviewed science.
To quote your own words, you have clearly been “made to look very stupid”.
Tom_Dubya,
When hysteria mongers shriek about Arctic sea ice melting, are they guilty of presenting regional data as if it were global data? More importantly, are they fundamentally misleading the public?
Um, what exactly are your graphs trying to show ? Is this local, maybe Ishpeming Michigan. Regional ? National ? Because I think on a global scale your are wrong
Anonymous (Nov 10, 2009 1:07:00 PM):
1) Perhaps you missed the line at the top of the post describing:
“Inconvenient Truths about Continental USA Temperatures”
But, for further clarity, I have added a title line above each graph.
2) As for the question of the global climate, you might want to -- at a minimum - review just a brief summary of my evidence before wading into that one.
Post a Comment