“It is difficult to imagine a more bizarre academic dispute. Where exactly are 42 weather monitoring stations in remote parts of rural China?
But the argument over the weather stations, and how it affects an important set of data on global warming, has led to accusations of scientific fraud and may yet result in a significant revision of a scientific paper that is still cited by the UN's top climate science body.
It also further calls into question the integrity of the scientist at the centre of the scandal over hacked climate emails, the director of the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU), Dr Phil Jones. The emails suggest that he helped to cover up flaws in temperature data from China that underpinned his research on the strength of recent global warming.”
& read the rest:
Related Posts:
The Dog Ate Global Warming.
Warm Bias of about 30% in the IPCC Surface Temperature Trends.
AmazonGate & The Disreputable IPCC.
GlacierGate/PachauriGate.
ClimateGate.
No comments:
Post a Comment