But, it was becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the facts.
So, they (briefly) published evidence which many others had.
Then, under pressure, retreated back into propaganda:
Click here & examine manipulation of Wikipedia.
Click here & examine self-described climate change propaganda.
Click here for some basic climate change science.
2 comments:
You might be pleased to know that I was the origin of this story when I shared Jennifer Marohasy's blog - after I spotted and blogged the changes, we were sent the emails and we broke the story:
April 04, 2008
WMO: Global Temperatures in 2008 will be Lower than in 2007
Posted by Paul, at 05:23 PM
Global temperatures this year will be lower than in 2007 due to the cooling effect of the La Nina current in the Pacific, UN meteorologists have said.
The World Meteorological Organisation's secretary-general, Michel Jarraud, told the BBC it was likely that La Nina would continue into the summer.
This would mean global temperatures have not risen since 1998, prompting some to question climate change theory.
But experts have also forecast a record high temperature within five years, probably associated with another episode of El Nino.
BBC website: Global temperatures 'to decrease'
UPDATE - The Ministry of Truth have now changed the BBC headline to:
Global warming 'dips this year'
AND the text has been changed too, including the removal of, "probably associated with another episode of El Nino."
Posted by Paul at April 4, 2008 05:23 PM
http://www.jennifermarohasy.com/blog/archives/002898.html
http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/04/the-bbc-changes-news-to-accommodate-activist/
And according to Paul Biggs who blogged on the changed BBC story here, the BBC headline has actually been changed three times and at one stage was: Global warming ‘dips this year’.
Paul,
My hat is off to you. That's some great work. Thanks!
In my view, it’s best to examine ENSO-adjusted temperature data (while also recognizing the demonstrated warm bias of the terrestrial temperature data). Once we adjust for ENSO, even NOAA’s recent report presents (as you know) an “interesting” trend.
Post a Comment