at ABC News:
“In Abu Dhabi today, at a town hall meeting at Abu Dhabi's Zayed University for a taped show on MBC television called ‘Sweet Talk,’ Secretary of State Hillary Clinton labeled the Tucson shooter an ‘extremist.’…
The label ‘extremist’ in that context suggests a political motivation.”
Many government officials and Lame Stream Media “reporters” have attempted to link Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and anybody who ever even contemplated any support for the TEA Party to the Tucson tragedy. But, unlike the nuttiest of the “Progressive” fringe, most if not all of these more prominent sorts have at least had the common sense not to directly ascribe a political motive to the shooter. They mostly implied some sort of magical osmosis was to blame. Even the nutty nonsense which Paul Krugman wrote failed to jump this particular shark -- not so Hillary Clinton.
Earth to Hillary:
CBS reports Loughner was angry with Giffords for answering in Spanish when he asked her:
“How do you know words mean anything?”
Mother Jones reports Loughner was angry with Giffords for declining to answer when he asked her:
“What is government if words have no meaning?”
As far as I can tell, the only brand of “extremist” who asks those sorts of questions of his congressional representative is the extremely CRAZY sort.
Clearly, among those whom we expect to behave somewhat responsibly (at least on occasions such as this), Hillary has proven herself the least responsible of all.
2 comments:
I don't even get an honorable mention for bringing this to your attention?
AJ -- You didn’t look very hard. Click here.
Post a Comment