(I inserted the links):
“Media and the public generally believe the IPCC is making predictions and that is clearly the assumption for government policies. Sadly, members of the IPCC do nothing to dissuade the public from that view. All previous ‘projections’ were wrong. The most recent example is the period from 2000 to 2008. IPCC predicted warming but temperatures went down while CO2 increased. Finally, the IPCC AR4 itself explains why IPCC model projections fail.
‘Models continue to have significant limitations, such as in their representation of clouds, which lead to uncertainties in the magnitude and timing, as well as regional details, of predicted climate change.’ (AR4, Chapter 8. p.600)
It is hard to imagine a better example of Beadle’s axiom paraphrased as follows, ‘Half the work done by the IPCC is to make things appear what they are not.’ ”
& read the rest:
Remember, in 1971, climate alarmist-in-chief James Hansen, warned the world “of an impending ice age within 50 years”. Of course, peer reviewed science suggests Hansen -- relying solely upon his computer model -- was off by about 49,950 years. Click here for more insight into that chapter of the Hansen saga (including a now obsolete link to the Washington Times story which I linked to).
Today, both Hansen and the IPCC are still trying to scare the world with their equally flawed computer models. Aside from trying to scare us with exactly the opposite alarm, the only other difference is the alarmists now have an even more complicit and even less reliable self-described propaganda machine behind them.
Click here for some basic facts and peer reviewed science on climate change.
No comments:
Post a Comment