Libya - The WORST possible place to intervene?

Just when I think Obama could not possibly make any mistakes any bigger than those he has already made, the damn fool proves me wrong yet again.

Of all the possible places to intervene with United States military force, could Obama have POSSIBLY chosen ANY location any WORSE than Libya?

From the reporting I have seen thus far, my conclusion is that this is not a revolution. It’s not even a civil war. What we have in Libya is just straight-up anarchy. It’s like a really, really bad sequel to a Mad Max movie (only much more chaotic and FAR less purposeful).

Unlike Bush, Obama has gotten us involved in a situation where we have NO national security interest. Hell, if anything, assisting the al Qaeda infested “Libyan” “rebels” will almost certainly CREATE a national security problem for us!

Unlike both Iraq AND Afghanistan, Obama did not even CONSULT with Congress (much less secure their approval) before launching us into the mess. Vice President Biden is on record strongly asserting that failure to do so is an impeachable offense. Even Obama has asserted that he had NO Constitutional authority to do this.

Who the HELL elected this buffoon? Sorry, that was a rhetorical question.