Click here to learn more.
I would prefer to completely eliminate all entitlements -- now!
Private charities would do a FAR better job.
The economy would take off like a rocket.
The stock market would soar.
We would all be FAR better off.
But, the voters do not understand that.
It is unlikely they ever will.
By contrast, Ryan’s plan just might sell.
That would be FAR better than continuing our death spiral.
Ergo, Paul Ryan for President!
3 comments:
If more conservative voices were HALF as articulate as Ryan, his plan might have a chance. Keeping my fingers crossed...makes it hard to drink my coffee, though.
I am not sure if 'Ryan for President' is said in jest but in my opinion he is what the doctor ordered. Christy would also be a viable option as he does seem to not lack courage to face the real problems.
DudeInDenver,
I got a kick out of your coffee comment! :-)
John,
I would happily vote for either Ryan or Christie. Both have FAR more appeal than any of the more likely candidates (reminds me of 2008).
So far, Ryan may be less of a lightning rod. And, that might appeal more to the critical "Independent" vote.
Independents claim to hate attack ads. But, most of them are a squishy lot who don't have especially firm convictions, don't do much independent reading and/or research and who are actually easily influenced by attack ads. So, the candidate who is less of a lightning rod for such ads might have a better chance of getting elected.
Although I love what Christie has to say, his video clipped quotes can easily be taken out of context to create enormously dishonest (and, enormously effective) attack ads.
Post a Comment